Journal 1
San Miguel Arcangel School
Third grade
This class starts with an
exercise of recalling prior knowledge through a board game called super actions
race. It was as good as I was expected. Students worked in pairs asking and
answering questions about what they like or love doing. The flow of
communication was permanent for a while.
When students started misbehaving
I introduced the second activity. They were enthusiastic about it. Students
love hands-on-activities. In this part of the lesson, they had to create some
cards. They chose a set of pictures to write about what they like or love to
do. Some of them were very creative and at the end of the activity I could
notice that most of them did a good job. I was constantly walking around the
classroom and giving them feedback or answering their questions. The impact
that feedback has over the learners’ performances is immeasurable.
For the last activity, students
had to use the language in a conversation with their partners. It was about asking
and answering questions, using the cards made by them. The participation was dynamic. Learners were
mostly active, engaged and interested in the activity. However, I could not
manage the behavior of some students during the development of it. A few of
them were reluctant to participate for fear of speaking in English. I tried to
make them feel comfortable by working with them.
Journal 2
San Miguel Arcangel School
Fifth grade
The objectives of the lesson were
partially achieved. My students behave
well today. When some of them misbehave I just named them. If they were talking
loudly I just reduced the tone of my voice. I could implement the activities I
planned for this lesson. The game: “Action mimes” was very engaging for them.
So, after watching the video, I could notice that some learners were able to
recall most of the verbs introduced at the beginning of the class but some
others not. In the second activity, they could reinforce the vocabulary and
learners talk increased a lot as well as the negotiation of meaning. The flow
of the communication was active. Most of them used the language to
communicate. They showed interest and
enthusiasm.
One of my problems was timing. I
could have spent more time in the introductory activity to check learners
understanding, making more examples and asking them more questions but I though
time was not enough. I was permanently monitoring their learning process. I
tried to check understanding most of the time. In the first activity, I
provided them enough input and then I asked them to use the language by asking
questions. On the other hand, the game was a good strategy because they could
start practicing the verbs by recognizing them and the final activity was a
good choice because the main purpose of the activity was communication.
Cooperative learning was clearly seen in the lesson and it has many benefits.
If I had a chance to reteach this
lesson, I would spend less time introducing the vocabulary and I would provide
them more opportunities to use the language by answering questions about their
own experience. I would give them time to share their answers, because learners
would probably perform better if they the opportunity to first review their
answers with a partner before checking answers in a whole-class situation. For
the last activity, I would make Taylor’s journey shorter and more specific and
I would use the same question form as in the previous activity to ask what
Taylor did in her journey. I would be definitely more careful with the
pronunciation of some words. Besides, I would manage time better. I would apply
more cooperative learning to my teaching to make the class more interactive.
Journal 3
San Miguel Arcangel School
Fifth grade
The lesson went well. Leaners
completed the first activity in which they had to construct a story by ordering
a set of flashcards. However, I could notice that they just looked at the
picture but did not read the sentences due to the font size. They were just
ordering the pictures by common sense and that was not the purpose of the
activity. The last activity was much better because they work in pairs and do
cooperative learning. Once I checked understanding and they shared their
answers I realized they understood the passage.
In this lesson, I tried to get
students attention by using a basic riddle: if you hear me clap once… if you
hear me clap twice. When my whole class was ready, and started talking to them.
I was continuously walking around the classroom to monitor what learners are
doing.
Timing was a problem again. I
could have spent more time doing the first and the second activities. I could
have stopped for a while to clarify some doubts. Also, I wasted time taking
learners outside because the electricity has gone off for more than fifteen
minutes so my solution was to take them to the cafeteria.
I chose interactive activities to
promote cooperative learning. Games are always a good strategy to trigger
learning. It is important to check understanding as many times as possible.
Learners seemed to be delighted and enthusiastic with the activities. I did a
good job at managing the classroom in spite of the obstacles.
If I had a change to reteach this
lesson, I would do first the activity in which they have to work in groups to
unscramble the sentences. Moreover, I would promote peer feedback in this
activity by asking them to exchange their worksheets with the other groups.
Then, I would try an activity in which they have to construct the ending of
story by working in groups. I would be clearer when giving instructions.
Finally, I would do the last activity as it was initially planned and I would
assign homework for them to practice at home.
Journal 4
San Miguel Arcangel School
Fifth grade
This lesson flowed smoothly. The
second activity was a successful choice. Learners enjoyed this activity so much
because it was very interactive and appealing. It seemed that they understood
how to organize the sentences correctly after sharing their answer with the
rest of the group. The last activity was a challenge due to the limited time.
However, learners’ performance was quite better. The result was not what I was
expecting but most of them get the best out of their potential to construct a
story. They did not have enough time to complete the activity but what they did
was an evidence of understanding. I was continuously walking around the
classroom to monitor what learners were doing. In some situations, learners get
distracted when they have to work in groups.
I couldn’t finish the final
activity. I could have spent less time giving the instructions and making the
groups. Besides, learners spent more time that I was expecting because the
assignment was a little bit complex for them. Despite of the fact it was a
group activity, some members of the groups did not help actively. I implemented
a game which promotes interaction and increases motivation and learners talk.
They were engaged in the activity and the participation was dynamic. The last
activity let me know what learners have learnt during the three last classes.
If I had a chance to reteach this
lesson, I would change the way I implement the last activity of this lesson. I
would give learners a shorter sample of a story using only a limited number of verbs
and I would be clear when giving them instructions to make their own. I would
show them a set of flashcards with the actions as guidance and I would let them
make the groups. I would monitor their work by providing them feedback.